I am not sure how much effect that this bill will have on class action law suits in actuality. It will stop plaintiff lawyers from forum shopping (finding the most sympathetic court to hear the case), which I don't think is a particularly bad idea. But, it will essentially now allow the defense attorneys to do the same thing (forum shop) in federal court so they can find the most sympathetic court to try the case. This can have disastrous effect on consumer protection. Only time will tell whether this will make the American people less safe from dangerous products. In the end, I don't see much changing.
Bush Signs Bill Curbing Class-Action Suits
By JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - President Bush on Friday signed a bill that he says will curtail multimillion-dollar class action lawsuits against companies and "marks a critical step toward ending the lawsuit culture in our country."
The legislation aims to discourage multimillion-dollar class-action lawsuits by having federal judges take them away from state courts, a victory for conservatives who hope it will lead to other lawsuit limits. The president has described class-action suits as often frivolous, and businesses complain that state judges and juries have been too generous to plaintiffs.
"This bill helps fix the system," Bush said in the East Room of the White House, his first bill signing ceremony this year. "Congress has done it's duty."
But during the brief ceremony, Bush repeatedly described the bill as just a beginning in his drive to place much broader restraints on the American legal system.
"We're making important progress toward a better legal system," he said. "There's more to do. ... We have a responsibility to confront frivolous lawsuits head-on."
Under the legislation, class-action suits seeking $5 million or more would be heard in state court only if the primary defendant and more than one-third of the plaintiffs are from the same state. But if fewer than one-third of the plaintiffs are from the same state as the primary defendant, and more than $5 million is at stake, the case would go to federal court.
Consumer groups and trial lawyers fought against the bill, but lost their struggle when Republicans gained seats in last fall's elections and Democrats defected on the issue.
"The House of Representatives joined the Senate in sending a clear message to the nation: the rights of large corporations that take advantage of seniors, low-wage workers and local communities are more important than the rights of average American citizens," said Helen Gonzales of USAction, a liberal, pro-consumer activist group.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I agree with some of your assessments and have had the same discussion about the diversity issues. None of us think this will go with out being constitutionally challenged, but article III does give fairly broad construct over the federal courts and this could easily fall under the commerce clause. It is something I will be watching closely over the next couple of months.
Either way, I really don't see much happening to change what is going on.
Post a Comment